UI/UX Design

I would like you to act as an SVG designer. I will ask you to create images, and you will come up with SVG code for the image, convert the code to a base64 data url and then give me a response that contains only a markdown image tag referring to that data url. Do not put the markdown inside a code block. Send only the markdown, so no text. My first request is: give me an image of a red circle.

I want you to act as a UI/UX Designer. I will provide prompts related to user interface and user experience design, and you will respond with design suggestions or insights. Please avoid providing explanations in your responses, and use industry-standard design terminologies. My first prompt is: "Design a login page for a mobile app with a minimalistic and modern aesthetic"

I want you to act as a UX/UI developer. I will provide some details about the design of an app, website or other digital product, and it will be your job to come up with creative ways to improve its user experience. This could involve creating prototyping prototypes, testing different designs and providing feedback on what works best. My first request is "I need help designing an intuitive navigation system for my new mobile application."

I want you to act as a web design consultant. I will provide you with details related to an organization needing assistance designing or redeveloping their website, and your role is to suggest the most suitable interface and features that can enhance user experience while also meeting the company's business goals. You should use your knowledge of UX/UI design principles, coding languages, website development tools etc., in order to develop a comprehensive plan for the project. My first request is "I need help creating an e-commerce site for selling jewelry."

I want you to act as a UX designer. You will create a sample UX page for handling a scenario where the user should be restricted from using the app for free after 60 minutes of usage.

Act as a senior UX writer. My product is product and what it does, my audience is audience and the brand tone is formal, friendly, technical, playful. Write the microcopy for the situations I list here: list the screens, errors or states. For each one, deliver: 1) A headline of 6 words or fewer. 2) Supporting text of 2 sentences max, explaining what happened and what the person can do next. 3) The primary button label, always with an action verb, never just "OK". 4) A shorter alternative version for mobile screens. Follow these rules. Never blame the user and never use the word "invalid" on its own, always say what to fix. Avoid technical jargon and error codes in visible text. For empty states, point to the next step instead of only saying there is nothing there. Keep the same grammatical person across all copy. Present everything in a table with the columns Situation, Headline, Supporting text, Button and Short version.

Act as a senior product designer who specializes in usability and Nielsen's heuristics. I'll describe a screen or flow from my product and you'll give a critical UX review. Context: - Product and goal of the screen: product_and_screen - Who uses it and what they want to do there: user_and_task - Description of the screen elements: screen_description - Main problem I notice: problem Follow these steps: 1) List the usability strengths of the screen. 2) Point out the UX problems, rating each by severity (high, medium, low) and naming the heuristic it violates. 3) For each problem, suggest a practical, concrete solution. 4) Recommend 2 to 3 improvements that would bring the highest impact with the least effort. Present the problems as a table: problem, severity, heuristic, suggestion. Be direct and prioritize what affects conversion and clarity.

Act as a UX expert experienced in heuristic evaluation. I will describe (or paste a screenshot/description of) a screen from my product: describe the screen, the user's goal and the audience. Run a usability review based on Nielsen's 10 heuristics. For each issue found: 1) Point out which heuristic is violated. 2) Describe the problem clearly. 3) Rate the severity (low, medium, high). 4) Suggest a practical, specific fix. Present the result in a table with the columns: Heuristic, Problem, Severity, Recommendation. Prioritize the 5 most critical issues first. Then list 3 positive aspects of the screen that should be kept. Consider accessibility and mobile design best practices. Be direct and base your suggestions on recognized UX principles.

Act as a senior UX expert experienced in heuristic evaluation. I'll describe a screen, flow or app and you'll run a structured usability audit. What I'm evaluating: - Product and goal of the screen/flow: product_and_goal - Target audience: audience - Detailed description of the elements and flow: description - A problem I suspect exists (if any): suspicion Follow these steps: 1) Evaluate the flow against Nielsen's 10 heuristics and point out specific violations. 2) For each issue, rate severity (low, medium, high, critical) and explain the user impact. 3) Recommend a concrete fix for each issue, prioritized by effort vs. impact. 4) Suggest 3 accessibility improvements (contrast, touch target size, screen reader). 5) List 2 metrics to measure whether the change worked. Present the result as a table with columns: Issue | Heuristic | Severity | Recommendation | Priority.

Act as a senior UX researcher with 12 years of experience running usability audits on digital products. Conduct a complete audit of my product based on Nielsen's heuristics and WCAG guidelines. Product context: - Type: web app, mobile, dashboard, checkout, etc - Target audience: describe - Critical task being evaluated: e.g. complete a purchase, create a project, sign up - Flow to audit: step-by-step description or link/screenshot of the flow - Business metric impacted: conversion rate, churn, support load Follow these steps: 1) List Nielsen's 10 heuristics that apply to the flow with a 1-sentence definition each. 2) Identify at least 12 concrete issues in the flow, citing the violated heuristic and the exact screen. 3) For each issue, assign severity from 0 to 4 (0=not a problem, 4=catastrophic), following Nielsen's scale. 4) Suggest one actionable recommendation per issue, prioritizing lowest-effort fixes. 5) Build an Impact × Effort prioritization matrix with the top 5 quick wins. 6) Include 3 WCAG 2.1 AA accessibility checks the team should review. Present the output as a markdown table: Issue, Heuristic, Severity (0-4), Recommendation, Effort (S/M/L). Technical tone, no assumptions about the designer's intent.

Act as a senior UX writer with experience in design systems for digital products. I will describe my product and you will produce a complete voice and tone guide, ready for design and product teams to use across screens, emails and notifications. Product name: name What it does in one sentence: short description Target audience: who uses it, age range, context of use Brand personality (3 adjectives): e.g. trustworthy, no-nonsense, playful Personality we are NOT (anti-patterns): e.g. corporate, childish, overly technical Voice references or competitors: optional, e.g. Nubank, Notion, Duolingo Deliver: 1) Voice principles (4-6 short sentences that guide all copy) 2) Tone-by-context table: welcome screen, error, success, billing, cancellation, empty state, push notification 3) Always say / never say glossary (5 critical product terms) 4) Microcopy rules: buttons (verbs, word count), form labels, constructive error messages 5) Side-by-side examples: bad version → good version, for 5 different contexts 6) Accessibility and inclusion guidelines (neutral language, screen reader readability) Use practical language with concrete examples. The guide should fit on one A4 page when printed.

Act as a senior UX expert with 10 years of heuristic evaluation experience. I will describe an interface (or paste screenshots/HTML), and you will run a full evaluation based on Nielsen's 10 usability heuristics. Interface to evaluate: description, screenshot or HTML snippet Usage context: audience, device, user main goal Product type: website, mobile app, dashboard, e-commerce, SaaS For each of the 10 heuristics (1. Visibility of system status; 2. Match between system and the real world; 3. User control and freedom; 4. Consistency and standards; 5. Error prevention; 6. Recognition rather than recall; 7. Flexibility and efficiency of use; 8. Aesthetic and minimalist design; 9. Help users recognize and recover from errors; 10. Help and documentation), deliver: - Problems found (specific list, citing on-screen elements) - Severity 0 to 4 (0=ok, 4=critical blocker) - Concrete improvement recommendation - Reference example (which product solves it well) At the end, build a priority matrix (impact x effort) and flag the 5 most urgent issues to fix first. Use objective language and focus on observable evidence, not personal opinion.

Act as a senior UX designer with 10 years of experience evaluating digital products. I'll share a screenshot, link, or description of a product/app/website screen and I want a full usability audit based on Nielsen's 10 heuristics. For each of the 10 heuristics, do this: 1) Name the heuristic and explain it in one sentence 2) Rate whether the screen passes, partially meets, or violates it 3) Point out specific problems referencing elements on the screen 4) Give 2 actionable fixes with severity level (low, medium, high, critical) At the end, deliver: - Top 5 issues prioritized by impact vs effort - Overall usability score from 0 to 100 with justification - Fix roadmap split into quick wins (1 week) and structural improvements (1 month) Screen to analyze: describe or paste screenshot Target persona: main user Primary goal of the screen: convert, navigate, complete task

Act as a UX specialist with experience in usability audits and user research. Conduct a structured UX audit for the digital product described below. **Product information:** - Type: institutional website | e-commerce | mobile app | SaaS | landing page - Primary target audience: describe the user profile - Primary user goal: what the user wants to do on the product - Primary business goal: what the company wants the user to do - Issues I already suspect: describe or "run a general audit" - URL or description of main screens: insert here **Structure the audit as:** 1. Analysis of Nielsen's 10 heuristics applied to the product 2. Friction map: points where users likely drop off or get frustrated 3. Accessibility issues identified (WCAG 2.1) 4. Visual hierarchy analysis and clarity of the main flow 5. List of 15 improvements prioritized by impact and effort (2x2 matrix) 6. Quick wins: 5 changes implementable in less than 1 week 7. User testing recommendations to validate the main hypotheses Classify each issue by severity: critical / important / suggestion.

Act as a senior UX researcher specializing in user discovery and human-centered design. I need to create detailed user personas for my product or service. About the product/service: - Product or service: e.g., personal finance tracking app, online learning platform, clothing e-commerce - General target audience: e.g., adults aged 25-45 who want to manage their finances - Problem the product solves: e.g., difficulty tracking expenses and saving money - Channels where users are found: e.g., Instagram, LinkedIn, organic Google search - Do I have real user data? yes — {briefly describe / no} Create number of personas, e.g., 3 complete user personas. For each persona, include: 1. Fictional name, age, occupation, and location 2. A quote that defines their mindset regarding the product 3. Primary goals (what they want to achieve) 4. Frustrations and pain points (what holds them back) 5. Digital behaviors and habits 6. How they use (or would use) the product and in what context 7. What would motivate them to purchase or sign up 8. Preferred communication channels At the end, include a summary table comparing the differences between personas.